I will be fairly brief. This is a followup amendment. We have already accepted the congressional intent that we will have a preference toward administrative enforcement. This is a followup limitation amendment that basically says we will not, for this calendar year, use the Private Enforcement Initiative. As the gentleman from North Carolina said, we can always come back; but I think we need to have time for this GAO study that I have requested to come back because I would assert that administrative enforcement is less expensive to taxpayers than private enforcement. It creates more certainty. It happens faster. It has less conflict of interest than the Private Enforcement Initiative. I would ask that my colleagues support this limitation amendment on the Private Enforcement Initiative for this year period. I reserve the balance of my time. {time} 0015
Steve Stivers: “I will be fairly brief. This is a followup amendment. We have already accepted the congressional intent that we will…”
Share
More from Steve Stivers
I want to thank Congressman Perlmutter for his hard work on this. I am an unlikely person to support this bill because I am opposed to recreational marijuana, but I came to this because a company that is just outside my district that sells…
I want to thank Bishop Irinej, from the Serbian Orthodox Church, for offering today's prayer. We are at the 100-year anniversary of when President Woodrow Wilson raised the Serbian flag in a show of support for the Serbian people. That…
I am not going to back down from passing our bill, because I think it is really important.
I thank Ranking Member Graves for yielding me the time. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this en bloc amendment. There is a lot of bipartisan support for an infrastructure bill, so it is a shame that today we are considering a…





