Reclaiming my time, no, there would not, because if they can file lawsuits that the law--we haven't changed the law. In fact, all we have added is a good faith exception that allows somebody to defend themselves and get a lawsuit dropped. So there is nothing in this bill that would protect anybody that acts in bad faith. Mr. McGOVERN. This bill shifts to the consumer the burden of proving a creditor acted in bad faith, and that puts more of the burden on the consumer. If that is what the gentleman wants to do, fine. We have a disagreement. We want the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Maxine Waters) to be able to have her amendment so we can debate that issue.
Steve Stivers: “Reclaiming my time, no, there would not, because if they can file lawsuits that the law--we haven't changed the law. In…”
Share
More from Steve Stivers
I would urge you to increase that collaboration, because the lines between securities, banking, and capital markets are blurring more than ever before.
I claim time in opposition, although I am not opposed to the amendment. The Acting CHAIR. Without objection, the gentleman from Ohio is recognized for 5 minutes. There was no objection.
I would like to begin by congratulating my good friend and colleague, Congresswoman Joyce Beatty, for advancing the Housing Financial Literacy Act, H.R. 2162. It is an effort she has championed for years. As co-chair of the Financial…
I thank the ranking member for yielding. I don't want to fall into revisionist history. I was one of the Republicans who signed the discharge petition against my own chairman and against my own leadership in 2014 and supported the Ex-Im…





