Why should we continue with this failed program that the Department has characterized as, No. 1, subject to a high degree of risk; two, not needed because we can utilize existing assets to provide the capabilities; and, three, too costly?
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the continuation of a costly and risky defense program.
Share
More from Sherrod Brown
It has been 100 days of broken promises, cuts, and chaos from the Trump administration. The damage has been done from my district in Cleveland to rural America. Here is how Trump has hurt the farm economy in just 100 days: President Trump…
That's why I'm running for Senate, because even in these challenging times, I still believe if you stand up for workers, treat people with respect, and always fight for Ohio, you can actually make a difference.
The frustrating thing is that this shouldn’t be controversial. We’re talking about basic consumer protection here.
During Black History Month and throughout the year, it is important that we honor the legacies of those that came before us. Today, I rise to reflect on a remarkable story that hits close to home. I recently learned that a late resident of…





