Mike Turner

When this first occurred last time during this administration -- remember, this is the third year of this administration -- they should have been preparing for this.

This was quite a risk by China, quite a calculation that they would take a balloon, put it up in China, take it across the United States where it's clearly going to be discoverable by us.

Clearly, this was an attempt by China to gather information, to defeat our command and control of our sensitive missile defense and nuclear weapon sites.

This should never have been allowed to enter the United States, and it never should've been allowed to complete its mission.

Absolutely. And I believe, answering your question, that people certainly are going to take into consideration a statement like this as they evaluate a candidate.

I vehemently disagree with -- with the statement that Trump has made.

I agree, absolutely, that this is -- this is something where -- look, this is a war of aggression that Russia needs to reevaluate and to withdraw from Ukraine.

I vehemently disagree with the statement that Trump has made.

This is a war of aggression that Russia needs to reevaluate and to withdraw from Ukraine.

It depends on what the nuclear information is. You can say nuclear weapons, but there are things that are highly, highly classified. There`s things that are not extremely classified, but are nonetheless classified. The other aspect with…

This sounds more like a bookkeeping issue than it is of a national security threat, which means it doesn’t rise to the level of justifying raiding the former president’s home.

Well, I don`t know. I mean, you have to ask him. But certainly, we all know that every former president has access to their documents. It`s how they write their memoirs. They don`t have access -- you know, great recall of everything that`s…

You can say nuclear weapons, but there are things that are highly, highly classified. There`s things that are not extremely classified but are nonetheless classified. It would be very, very narrow of anything that just has the umbrella of…

Every former president has access to their documents. It's how they write their memoirs.

If they fall within that category, they`re not an imminent national security threat.

It depends on what the nuclear information is. You can say nuclear weapons, but there are things that are highly, highly classified. There are things that are not extremely classified. But our, nonetheless, classified.

I understand Missile Tracking/Missile Warning is the Space Force's top priority.

I would inform Congressman Harris, the Ambassador to NATO from Hungary openly supports this center, and I know Poland does also. This is something that is important overall for NATO, and it does have the support of both of those nations…

We were all very concerned, as the war broke out in Ukraine, as to the concern about weapons getting into Ukraine.

I believe that it has shown over and over that it is very good at spending money. It is not very good at spending money wisely, and it is not very good at all at innovating.

The resources we commit now and in the future will preserve a free and open Indo-pacific and strengthen our posture and provide us with the ability to fight and win should deterrence fail.

There's no question about that. I made reference to our reentry program, the dollars that we are investing in that.

I just don't see any inherent value from permitless carry House Bill 1927.

This bill took effect September 1st of last year. The Major Cities Police Chiefs, a major law enforcement organization, testified against it.

Absolutely. No question.