we better open up this morning and characterize what the Burns-Chambliss-Inhofe amendment does compared to what is being advocated by my friend from California. Our amendment directs the administrator of EPA to conduct a thorough review of all third-party intentional human dosage studies based on six principles listed at the National Academy of Sciences in their February 2004 report. The National Academy report found that, in certain cases, the societal benefits of such studies outweigh the risks. This amendment also directs the administrator to issue a final rule that addresses applying ethical standards to third-party studies involving intentional human dosing to identify or quantify toxic effects within 180 days of enactment of this act. In other words, they have an open end now where they drag their feet as far as offering reports to Congress. By the way, I ask unanimous consent Senator Brownback of Kansas be added as a cosponsor. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Joseph T. Burns: “we better open up this morning and characterize what the Burns-Chambliss-Inhofe amendment does compared to what is being…”
Share
More from Joseph T. Burns
Maintaining the integrity of our elections and ensuring that voters have confidence in our system is not and should not be a partisan issue.
this week, the Senate is undertaking a significant effort to reduce Federal spending and return fiscal responsibility to the Congress. Not since 1997 has Congress attempted a budget reconciliation bill. But the fiscal situation facing the…
I have a letter in support of my amendment from the Veterans of Foreign Wars. I ask unanimous consent that the letter in support of this amendment be printed in the Record. There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed…
this is a special day to those of us who serve on the Commerce Committee and have served on the Commerce Committee ever since we have been in the Senate because today is the 10th anniversary of the Telecom Act of 1996. I want to talk about…





