I think I would be remiss as ranking member on this committee and a comanager on this bill if I did not fight for the rights of the rest of the Members in this body to have a vote. I think it is what it is all about. That is for debate. I haven't heard anybody come down here and talk against the merits of this second-degree amendment. It will not go away. And silence tells me that maybe the case has already been made and hard to defend of what we are trying to do as far as forest health is concerned. Twenty years, 25 years is a track record, a known track record. And now we see the culmination of those management practices over that many years in the growth of the forest and what it can lead to if we allow folks who probably don't have all the experience in the world, on the ground management of a renewable resource, what that brings us to. So I would hope that we would support cloture or deny cloture so this issue can be talked out because it will not go away.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of voting rights and forest management during Senate debate.
Share
More from Joseph T. Burns
I rise today to discuss one small piece of this legislation which will make a big difference in rural States such as Montana. I am talking about the broadband expensing provision, which would encourage broadband providers to extend their…
9 times out of 10, whenever we get in trouble in this body it is in dealing with definitions up front. That is our problem now. I know they are trying to work out some way over there to define certain parts of this, but there has to be…
I have heard a lot of baloney, and there appears to be a good bit in the House. I have great respect for the minority whip, but there is beef in the gentleman from Wisconsin's (Mr. Obey) job-cutting proposal. This is about jobs. This is…
That is a large swing. We are talking a 10 percent, 11 percent swing over the next 2 years.





