I submit to my friend from Michigan that we have laws now that have created a lot of problems and still have sunsets, but yet the law and the programs created under the law still continue. A case in point is we have not reauthorized the Endangered Species Act, yet it has been funded and it comes on today. Many of those kinds of rules and regulations that we are going to have to deal with that really have an impact on communities--wetlands, endangered species, clean water, all of these acts--are now being funded and are in place, but have not been reauthorized by this Congress. I suggest, if we have created a problem through this piece of legislation, we can fix it or unfix it here. But when we rely on a sunset to fix the problem, it does not get fixed. In fact, it rolls on and it is a lot easier to say, ``Well, we will not reauthorize that this year.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of sunset provisions in legislation during a floor debate.
Share
More from Joseph T. Burns
That is a large swing. We are talking a 10 percent, 11 percent swing over the next 2 years.
there are still Members in this body that do not understand what marriage penalty relief is about. They only understand tax and spending increases, for any reason regardless of whether any particular tax may be unfair or inefficient or…
I agree with my chairman that we should be here solving problems instead of throwing salt on old wounds because we have a great challenge ahead of us. There comes a time when we talk about all kinds of interests, but the national interest…
It is pretty clear to me, and I think it was pretty clear to the judge and most other folks who look at this that the State Constitution is pretty specific that only citizens are entitled to vote.





