This is another attempt to do away with the timber program and the salvage program, and all those associated with them. If you want to do something about fires, or the safety of the forests, or the health of the forests, what you do is maintain a healthy harvest situation. In other words, it just makes a lot of sense. It is the old idea of the Government having to own all the land. You have to harvest those trees. To take the money away from it does not get to the environmental objective that a lot of us want to get to. I hope my colleagues will reject this amendment.
Joseph T. Burns: “This is another attempt to do away with the timber program and the salvage program, and all those associated with them.…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to timber and salvage programs during a floor debate.
Share
More from Joseph T. Burns
That is correct. This directs the Census Bureau to take a study and get the true impact of how counting illegal aliens affects the reapportionment in the House of Representatives.
The Senator is correct. I am willing to work with the Senator from Wisconsin, Mr. Feingold, and the ranking member of the subcommittee, Mr. Dorgan to request in writing this audit by the Government Accountability Office.
I am very supportive of the Senator from Nebraska on this issue. I wish we could have gotten a vote and not have to deal with a point of order. I don't think the fires we have had in Montana and the dry weather we have had in Montana yield…
The Senator is correct. The Bureau of Land Management currently does not have the mechanism in place to implement a pilot project like this. However, there are entities in the private sector that have a well-established history of…





