this is another attempt to do away with the timber program and the salvage program, and all those associated with them. If you want to do something about fires, or the safety of the forests, or the health of the forests, what you do is maintain a healthy harvest situation. In other words, it just makes a lot of sense. It is the old idea of the Government having to own all the land. You have to harvest those trees. To take the money away from it does not get to the environmental objective that a lot of us want to get to. I hope my colleagues will reject this amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to timber and salvage programs during a floor debate.
Share
More from Joseph T. Burns
there are still Members in this body that do not understand what marriage penalty relief is about. They only understand tax and spending increases, for any reason regardless of whether any particular tax may be unfair or inefficient or…
I am pleased that amendment No. 3457 was accepted by unanimous consent in the Senate today. While I fully support the underlying Brownback legislation, I have offered a second- degree amendment to protect the interests of small…
Ray Charles was a musical genius, a great American, someone who stood for the rights of others. His life and his work will live forever through his music and through his legacy. I urge my colleagues to support H. Con. Res. 449 honoring the…
Absolutely. So what we are going to do is tax only those people who make over $4,000, a king's ransom at that time, and unfortunately, at least for the Congress, they were trying to use the existing Constitution. Because of its vagueness…





