I have often said, before we can attain success in what we are trying to do in bringing down the size of Government, in trying to make it more efficient, there are probably three areas of reform: Regulatory reform, budget reform, and spending reform. There is a very simple bottom line to that. Regulatory reform-- regulations have to be reviewed, as S. 1 does review those, for impact on not only the economy but upon the way we do our business with our State and local governments. Budget reform--inasmuch as we have to get away from, I think, baseline budgeting. We have to go back to the old situation of starting at ground zero and building a budget, or at least based on previous years' expenditures, to bring some kind of honesty and integrity and accountability to the American people. And in spending reform--I have a feeling inside me that maybe we should only spend money on those programs that have been authorized and not delve into some things that have not been authorized.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing government reform and the implications of legislation during a Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Joseph T. Burns
Maintaining the integrity of our elections and ensuring that voters have confidence in our system is not and should not be a partisan issue.
This is a Simple Tax For Seniors Act. Simple. Simple tax for seniors. 1982, 24 years ago, the IRS developed the 1040EZ which works for everyone in America except seniors. 24 years. The IRS had an opportunity to correct an oversight, really…
I spent 20 years in public education at the university level training young men and women to practice lifelong learning. The field that I was a part of was in computer and information systems, and I began that adventure in the early 1970s…
It is about fairness. It is about a fair, competitive, global environment. And right now the current income tax system is putting us at a severe disadvantage. The fair tax would relieve that, make that playing field more level, and more…





