Jim Jordan
The Public Record
Jim Jordan is an American politician and attorney serving as the U.S. Representative for Ohio's 4th congressional district since 2007. A member of the Republican Party, he is known for his strong conservative stance and is a founding member of the House Freedom Caucus, which advocates for limited government and fiscal responsibility. Throughout his tenure, Jordan has been involved in various legislative efforts and has gained prominence for his role in high-profile investigations and oversight hearings.
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this question are postponed. =========================== NOTE ===========================…
The gentlewoman used the word ``violence.'' Violence? Fifty crisis pregnancy centers and churches have been attacked in the last 11 weeks--50 in 11 weeks. Think about that. As I said in my opening statement, the leader of the Senate stood…
The chairman of the full committee is right. This legislation would, in fact, codify Obergefell. But what it would also do is reverse the law in 35 States, where those States have said, marriage should be what--you know--traditional…
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this question are postponed. =========================== NOTE ===========================…
The Speaker of the House just said, ``Republicans knew the Defense of Marriage Act was unconstitutional when they passed it.'' Did the 118 Democrats who voted for that legislation know the same thing? Did the President of the United…
As I said at the outset and the gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Johnson) and the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Roy) have said, we think this legislation is unnecessary. Justice Alito was very clear--again, it has been read several times-- the…
Never before in our history has the government known more about its citizens and had more sophisticated tools for spying on us than right now.
Over the last year, we have seen how big government has threatened almost every freedom Americans enjoy.
Well, this is a question, this is straight on the Supreme Court -- Supreme Court`s decision. This is the question that the legislators in the respective states will answer --
I never doubted a child. I was responding to a headline from your profession, a news profession, which happens all the time on Twitter.
I would just add that the gentleman said it has nothing to do with the Biden Justice Department. Well, it certainly does. It gives $2 million to the Biden Justice Department to create a program the States can already do. This is the same…
This bill is about Democrat fearmongering that guns are an ever-present threat and we cannot be safe until big government rounds up every last one of them.
Never doubted the child. I was responding to a headline from your profession, the news profession, which happens all the time on Twitter.
To ensure that our decision is not misunderstood or mischaracterized, we emphasize, we emphasize that our decision concerns the constitutional right to abortion and no other right.
We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled. The Constitution makes no reference to abortion and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision.
While I am waiting because I have one more speaker who would like to weigh in. As has been said, this bill is redundant. States can already do it if they so choose. This bill is part of a series of legislation that the Democrats have…
We are the party that is pro-life. We actually think you should protect unborn children.
That is a concerted effort to go after pro-life people and intimidate a separate and equal branch of government.
It was surreal. You know, you walk in and there`s Rudy Giuliani. I think what it was really about was providing what they believe to be some kind of legitimate basis for the legislature to go into special session and basically throw out…





