I rise to oppose gratuitous language that would forbid the District to use its own funds as part of a lawsuit testing whether American citizens who happen to live in the Nation's capital are constitutionally entitled to voting rights in the Congress of the United States. I stand here as the only Member who represents taxpaying American citizens who are denied full representation in the Congress. Are we to add to this basic denial an attempt to deny the right to seek redress in the courts, as well? Do we really want to add one basic denial onto another, first denial of fair representation, then denial of the right to test that notion in a court of law? This provision is unworthy of this House unless we want to be in the company of the authoritarian regimes of the world. The denial of court redress is gratuitous and futile because the lawsuit is being carried pro bono by a major downtown law firm. The District's involvement is marginal, involving only such occasional advice from the City's Corporation Counsel, as should be responsibly required. It would be hard to even calculate the amount of District funds, so great is the responsibility of the private lawyers. Please, do not allow history to add to the litany of denials to the people I represent.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a provision that would restrict the District of Columbia from using its funds in a voting rights lawsuit.
Share
More from James Norton
the poor in our country have assumed a high profile today because of the state of the economy. I hope that the gentlelady's resolution helps us to bear in mind that the poor in our country need a higher profile throughout the 110th…
while the D.C. business community may not have supported the D.C. law that is the subject of this disapproval resolution, their letter states they oppose this disapproval resolution because it would, if enacted, cause ``chaos in the middle…
this is a special day for all Americans, none more so than the people I represent, the residents of the District of Columbia. And so I have come this evening to offer some remarks, remarks that I think are particularly justified today when…
I strongly oppose this bill, which repeals the police accountability and transparency law that the District of Columbia enacted in 2023. Last year, violent crime in D.C. was down 35 percent, reaching an over 30-year low. This year, violent…





