I want to make three points. One goes to the futility of this bill based on its unconstitutionality. The other goes to who gets protected. The final goes to the intolerable trade-off that this bill forces and that cannot be condoned under any circumstances. Why are we here on a bill that is unconstitutional on its face? We have not had to deal with the exception for health of the mother in the Hyde amendment and other matters because we had not focused on postviability. But the Supreme Court has been clear. I want to quote the language, that a bill is unconstitutional if it 'fails to require that maternal health be the physician's paramount concern.' That is where the Catholic church has always been. That is where all of us have always been, if ever there is that kind of tragic decision to be made. We must face that now as we have not had to because we are focusing postviability. Why are we here on a bill that protects physicians and not women?
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the unconstitutionality and implications of a bill related to maternal health.
Share
More from James Norton
I would like to address provisions contained in section 2841 of H.R. 4200 that authorizes a transfer of 38 acres in the District of Columbia from the Department of Navy to the General Services Administration for the purpose of housing the…
Mr. Speaker, this is a no-cost bill. Indeed, the appropriations for an increase in the amounts paid to these attorneys has been appropriated. This is another of those District of Columbia anomalies. The courts of the District of Columbia…
I would hope that an amendment for the study of the crime and accident rate in the most-used national parks would be made in order and regret that it is not made in order. The issue is so important, I would like to discuss it on the floor…
I first came to Mississippi in 1963 in order to prepare for the summer of 1964 when students would come to the South and help the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee to register African Americans to vote in large numbers in the…





