Let me try to rebut two points that have been made here. Makes money. First of all, we lose right off the top. OPIC pays no taxes, pays no dividends, and two-thirds of its income comes from Treasury securities, from us to us. Second, unions who support it, there are always some unions who profit from exports. The real question for us is do we make up in the loss of jobs here? For example, let me take four of the large OPIC users. Ford, minus 160,000 jobs here; Exxon, minus 83,000 jobs here; AT&T, minus 127,000 jobs here, General Electric, minus 185,000 jobs here. When you show me they are making up for that kind of loss of jobs, you will get me.
James Norton: “Let me try to rebut two points that have been made here. Makes money. First of all, we lose right off the top. OPIC pays…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) and its impact on U.S. jobs.
Share
More from James Norton
D.C. residents have all the obligations of American citizenship, including paying Federal taxes, serving on juries, and registering with the Selective Service, yet Congress denies them full local self-government and voting representation…
While the D.C. business community may not have supported the D.C. law that is the subject of this disapproval resolution, their letter states they oppose this disapproval resolution because it would, if enacted, cause ``chaos in the middle…
The poor in our country have assumed a high profile today because of the state of the economy. I hope that the gentlelady's resolution helps us to bear in mind that the poor in our country need a higher profile throughout the 110th…





