let me try to rebut two points that have been made here. Makes money. First of all, we lose right off the top. OPIC pays no taxes, pays no dividends, and two-thirds of its income comes from Treasury securities, from us to us. Second, unions who support it, there are always some unions who profit from exports. The real question for us is do we make up in the loss of jobs here? For example, let me take four of the large OPIC users. Ford, minus 160,000 jobs here; Exxon, minus 83,000 jobs here; AT&T, minus 127,000 jobs here, General Electric, minus 185,000 jobs here. When you show me they are making up for that kind of loss of jobs, you will get me.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) and its impact on U.S. jobs.
Share
More from James Norton
This legislation institutes a new process that will significantly facilitate D.C. government operations, promote greater efficiency in Congress by conforming the handling of District of Columbia matters to House rules, and improve the…
I know what it means to be excluded from your own Constitution, and after the experience of African Americans in this country and a Civil War, I never thought I would see a civil war in law where we would try to exclude any other group of…
the D.C. local legislature, the Council, has 13 members. If D.C. residents do not like how members vote, residents can vote them out of office or pass a ballot measure. That is called democracy. Congress has 535 voting Members. None are…
Republicans regularly introduce legislation to repeal local D.C. laws. What is different about this bill is it also overrides longstanding wishes of the D.C. police department. For at least a quarter century, the D.C. police department has…





