Mr. Speaker, the need for national gun legislation is brought home by the virtual futility that many of us who have succeeded in getting strong gun legislation in our own jurisdictions now see to that effort. Many large cities in the United States, including the District of Columbia, have gun bans. There are those with the audacity, some of them on this floor occasionally to say words to the effect the District of Columbia has a gun ban, so what good are gun control laws? Well, that is a virtual concession to the proposition that we need national gun safety legislation in order to have truly effective local gun safety legislation, and that is all we are asking. That is all we are asking. We are not asking for uniformity, but we do think there should be a minimum standard that any decent civil society should have with respect to the most dangerous weapons in that society, guns. That is what these moms, I take it, are coming to say.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the need for national gun legislation and its impact on local laws.
Share
More from James Norton
while the D.C. business community may not have supported the D.C. law that is the subject of this disapproval resolution, their letter states they oppose this disapproval resolution because it would, if enacted, cause ``chaos in the middle…
I strongly oppose this bill, which repeals the police accountability and transparency law that the District of Columbia enacted in 2023. Last year, violent crime in D.C. was down 35 percent, reaching an over 30-year low. This year, violent…
The D.C. statehood bill, H.R. 51, the Washington, D.C. Admission Act, grants D.C. residents full local self-government and voting representation in Congress. H.R. 51 reduces the size of the Federal District from 68 square miles to 2 square…
I strongly oppose this unprecedented, undemocratic, and paternalistic disapproval resolution. This disapproval resolution would sabotage the District of Columbia's tax filing season and credit rating. The substance of the D.C. law that is…





