You see, Mr. President, the Senator from New York voted on this very floor to strip a retroactive extension of the statute of limitations from an RTC funding bill. The Senator from New York voted not to go after Madison Guaranty, and hundreds of other failed thrifts. In short, if the Senator from New York had his way, the statute of limitations on Madison would have expired 2 years ago. I cannot for the life of me understand the Senator's logic--if the Senator had his way, the Madison case would have been dead and buried 2 years ago. You can look up the Senator's vote: March 26, 1992. I have been fighting for the extension of the statute of limitations for a period of years. I have been looking for support, but I was not very able to get that support from the Senator from New York. March 26, 1992, was 26 days after the statute of limitations on Madison Guaranty Savings expired, and 3 weeks after the New York Times reported the Madison Guaranty Savings story. It is as plain as that. The Senator from New York voted to strip a retroactive extension from the bill. The Senator from New York voted to kill an extension that clearly would have covered Madison Guaranty Savings and Loan. For 21 months, the chance to sue Madison Guaranty Savings was nil. Nada. Zero. Zip. And just a couple of months ago, the Senator from New York voted to keep it that way.
Howard Metzenbaum: “You see, Mr. President, the Senator from New York voted on this very floor to strip a retroactive extension of the…”
Editor's note · Context
Metzenbaum criticizes a New York Senator's vote against extending the statute of limitations for Madison Guaranty Savings.
Share
More from Howard Metzenbaum
The Senator from New York has been righteously proclaiming a passionate belief that the statute of limitations should be extended in order to recover taxpayer losses in the Madison Guaranty failure. That is a terrific joke. I compliment…
we were all shocked on Wednesday to learn that a senior CIA case officer had been arrested and charged with being a spy for the Soviet Union and later for the Russian Federation. It is almost beyond belief that he had allegedly been…
I rise because I am somewhat disturbed that so much of this debate has revolved around female Members of this body, who have led the charge on this issue. But I rise because I believe it is an issue that belongs to the other 94 Members of…
I want to point out to him, and I want to make it clear, that when I tried to extend the statute of limitations in the past, one of the leaders in that opposition was the Senator from New York. If he had cooperated at that time, we would…





