I am pleased to offer this manager's amendment, which reflects extensive negotiations with the committee's ranking minority member, the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Frank), to resolve issues that arose when the committee marked up this legislation in July. The amendment makes largely technical and conforming changes to legislation that the committee overwhelmingly approved by a vote of 61 to 3. First, the amendment clarifies that while the new consumer protections against identity theft create uniform standards preempting State laws on the same specific subjects, the bill does not preempt subject matters that are outside the scope of those new provisions, such as limits on Social Security number use or criminal penalties for identity theft perpetrators. This approach assures that the strong new identity theft protections we establish in this legislation are applied uniformly across the country, while leaving undisturbed those State statutes that address subjects not covered by the bill's identity theft provisions. Second, the amendment includes language responsive to concerns raised by several members at the Committee on Financial Services's markup of the FACT Act relating to the new furnisher reinvestigation duties imposed by section 304 of the bill.
Hon. Michael G. Oxley: “I am pleased to offer this manager's amendment, which reflects extensive negotiations with the committee's ranking…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a manager's amendment related to consumer protections against identity theft.
Share
More from Hon. Michael G. Oxley
in closing, let me first of all recognize the gentleman from Pennsylvania, Mr. Fitzpatrick. He has been a real bulldog on this issue. The committee has worked its will passing this bill on a voice vote in the committee. His leadership has…
it occurred to me as I was listening to my friend from California, we could go back to the old days of giving out toasters for deposits. I would say that the system we have now, I have not heard of toaster promotion for a long time…
I stand in support of House Joint Resolution 65, disapproving the recommendations of the Base Realignment and Closure Commission. This will be my first vote against a BRAC list, and it is not a vote I take lightly. I support the BRAC…
Well, I think the gentleman from Massachusetts makes a good point. I think once we start down this slippery slope it is really not in the best interests of this institution. And I think, talking to Members privately on both sides of the…





