the first provision in the amendment which deals with removal of unfit corporate officers is more appropriately addressed in the underlying bill. CARTA, the bill before us, gives the SEC the authority to administratively bar directors and officers from serving in public companies. Under our legislation, the commission no longer would have to go to Federal Court to do this. The SEC must consider a number of factors, longstanding standards used by the courts, in order to make that determination. Our language is endorsed by the White House. CARTA also prevents corporate officers from profiting from erroneous financial statements. Our legislation was carefully crafted with the focus on bad actors. This language is also endorsed by the White House. On the issue of CEO certification, we are sympathetic to this well-intentioned legislative provision, but it is important to note that the President never requested legislation to accomplish this objective. The SEC already has the authority to require certification and is currently considering whether to do so. The SEC is in the best position to decide whether and how such a requirement would operate. It would do more harm than good to legislatively mandate what such a rule would look like, and that is exactly what we were told by Chairman Greenspan and Chairman Pitt. Proponents say this is the President's plan. The fact is, nothing could be further from the truth. Let us be clear.…
Hon. Michael G. Oxley: “the first provision in the amendment which deals with removal of unfit corporate officers is more appropriately…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing provisions of the CARTA bill related to corporate governance and SEC authority.
Share
More from Hon. Michael G. Oxley
I never thought a debate on GSE reform would be so emotional, and it has been a long day and a very productive day and a good debate. Let me, first of all, say to my friend from Massachusetts, who worked very well with us in committee on…
In adopting this provision, it is our intention that the regulatory agencies utilize section 702 with care and precision. Specifically, it is not intended to be used routinely in corporate applications, notices or requests to impose…
just in conclusion, I thank the gentleman from Pennsylvania for his kind words, and all the members on the committee who worked so hard on this, particularly Mr. Kanjorski and Mr. Frank on that side, and many, many others. Mr. Speaker…
I am not going to claim opposition because we support the amendment. I would just say to the gentlewoman, we are pleased to accept her amendment.





