since the passage of the 1992 Cable Act, the PCC staff has increased some 30 percent, making it one of the largest growing Federal bureaucracies in Washington. Most of the growth is due to the creation of the Cable Services Bureau. Listen to this: When established, the Cable Service Bureau has a staff of 59. Since the passage of the Cable Act of 1992, it has increased and has quadrupled in size. The 1995 cable services budget stands at $186 million, a 35-percent increase from the Cable Act. We do not need more bureaucrats telling the American public what they can and cannot pay for MTV and other cable services. It seems to me that the potential is clearly there for more and more competition. If we get bureaucracy in the way of competition, the bureaucracy always wins. It is important to understand the negative effects of the Cable Act of 1992. This amendment would exacerbate the terrible things that have happened since 1992.
Hon. Michael G. Oxley: “since the passage of the 1992 Cable Act, the PCC staff has increased some 30 percent, making it one of the largest…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of the 1992 Cable Act on federal bureaucracy and competition in cable services.
Share
More from Hon. Michael G. Oxley
I can't match the eloquence of the gentleman from Massachusetts, so I yield back
I never thought a debate on GSE reform would be so emotional, and it has been a long day and a very productive day and a good debate. Let me, first of all, say to my friend from Massachusetts, who worked very well with us in committee on…
I rise in support of the Real-time Investor Protection Act and would like to commend my good friend from Arizona, Mr. Shadegg, for his excellent work on this important legislation. Informed investors are critical to our Nation's markets…
Mr. Speaker, 4 years ago Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to rectify the troubling accounting and reporting issue exposed by the largest corporate scandals in U.S. history. This landmark legislation strengthened the role of auditors…





