It is astounding to me that in the 21st century we would turn back the clock and allow American taxpayer dollars to be used to discriminate against our own citizens based on their religious beliefs. This is 2003. I had hoped that we had moved beyond refusing to hire someone because they are Catholic or Jewish or Muslim or Presbyterian or whatever. This bill returns us to the bad old days. The Van Hollen amendment would strike this offensive provision, and it deserves a vote by this House. This bill is supposed to be about helping our unemployed workers, not about giving taxpayer money to organizations that discriminate. It is absolutely critical that we put aside partisan differences and give Members the chance to delete this language.
Deborah Pryce: “It is astounding to me that in the 21st century we would turn back the clock and allow American taxpayer dollars to be…”
Editor's note · Context
Arguing against a bill that allows discrimination in hiring based on religion.
Share
More from Deborah Pryce
There were statements made earlier that there were no cost savings in this bill, by a former speaker. There are cost savings. There is group purchasing and insurance benefits, a 25 to 30 percent savings. There is a discount card, 15 to 20…
I must take 1 minute to say that the gentleman has misspoken. Our most needy seniors, the seniors who need it most will be getting help with their prescription drugs, the best tool medicine has to offer, by next spring if we pass this…
I believe today we stand on the cusp of something very significant, and that is the chance to spare families forevermore from having to hear the words 'your child has cancer.' Today, after many hard years of work by staff here on Capitol…
I am not in need of any further time, and I thank the chairman for his understanding of these issues.





