House Resolution 380 allows for the orderly, but fair, consideration of H.R. 2703, the Effective Death Penalty and Public Safety Act of 1996. The rule provides for 1 hour of general debate equally divided between the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary, followed by the consideration of 17 amendments which are specified in the report accompanying this rule. While we could not make in order every amendment submitted to the Rules Committee, the committee has tried to be as fair as possible in crafting this resolution. Amendments are made in order which encompass major areas of controversy surrounding this legislation, including those related to material support for terrorist acts, international counterfeiting, immigration, and death penalty reform, to name just a few. I would also note that several amendments included in this rule have bipartisan sponsorship. So I would just emphasize that the more significant areas of concern to members will have an opportunity to be fully debated.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing House Resolution 380 regarding the Effective Death Penalty and Public Safety Act of 1996.
Share
More from Deborah Pryce
I was just curious as to whether the gentlewoman was in favor of her constituents and voted as such when she had the opportunity.
Mr. Speaker, everyone in this Chamber needs to support this important funding package. The President made it very clear when he articulated his plan to fight the war on terror. In no uncertain terms he declared that Iraq is now the central…
Mr. Speaker, I came to the House of Representatives nearly 9 years ago, and for the majority of my tenure here, Congress has been struggling with the concept of a bill of rights for patients. There are no policy arguments that have not…
as we consider the budget today, my colleagues on the other side of the aisle will talk about their budget for America, which includes repealing tax cuts we fought so hard for. But their quote-unquote repeal is nothing more than…





