let me make this point very clear. This does not apply to children. Let me read the exemptions once again: Anyone under 18 years old or over 50, this does not apply to them. Anyone medically certified as physically or mentally incapable or unfit for employment, it does not apply to them. A parent or other member of a household responsible for a dependent child, it does not apply to them. A pregnant woman, it does not apply to her. Also, if the gentleman wants to talk about unemployment, if we read the text, there are hardship exemptions. It can be waived. There are safeguards in this. The bottom line is it saves $2.2 billion on the fiscal side, but the real bottom line is it is responsible. It is a good amendment. It is fair. It is an amendment, and I cannot even believe some of the statements I have heard about this amendment. It is a very responsible amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing exemptions in a proposed amendment related to employment and fiscal savings.
Share
More from Bob Ney
I rise today in support in H. Res. 658, which recognizes National Homeownership Month and the importance of homeownership in the United States. Offered by my colleague and friend from California, Mr. Gary Miller, this resolution is a…
I am not sure I am going to attempt to actually answer that, but I will say this, and I respect always the gentleman's opinion: when he says the issue is about counting votes, we cannot count votes unless we have an election, I understand…
Whereas, the people of Ohio are commemorating Ohio's 200th Birthday on March 1, 2003; and Whereas, they will be celebrating the Bicentennial in Chillicothe, the original capital of the great state of Ohio; and Whereas, the residents of…
Mr. Speaker, I stand tonight applauding the efforts of our colleague, the gentlewoman from Texas; and I stand to support this motion to instruct. As we like to say around here, work, work, and we mean it this time on this. It is a good…





