Now eliminating soft money, which is what this amendment does, is a poison pill. We have really evolved. Somebody said this bill has barely changed. It is not the same species. I cannot believe that we are talking about doing something good with the elimination of the soft money, it now becomes a poison pill; but back-room deals can be cut all the time to evolve this bill. We bring up good amendments and all of the sudden they are just not good enough. In defense, somebody said tonight it can only be used for good purposes. It is still influence-peddling when someone is going to throw that money around. From our point of view, this is what my colleagues have said hundreds of times about this type of soft money. 501(c)(3) too is also in here, the 501(c)(3)s, and there is a building fund. This is so full of soft money, and my colleagues know it. This is a good amendment, makes a good correction. I urge support of the amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Debating the implications of an amendment related to soft money in campaign finance legislation.
Share
More from Bob Ney
let me make it clear, first of all, because we have heard the half a million dollar figure bandied about a couple times now. The gentleman from California (Mr. Pombo) never asked me for half a million dollars. Now, I can produce today…
I think this is a great day, and considering the holiday, and, in fact, my relatives came here under the name O'Ney, I would like to thank also the late Speaker, Tip O'Neill, our current Speaker O'Hastert and Congressman O'Larson for…
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 2195 authorizes the Smithsonian Institution to undertake several important activities important to their operations. The legislation authorizes construction at the Patent Office Building, as well as construction of a…
I commend the leadership shown by the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Oxley), the ranking member, the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Frank), and the subcommittee chairman, the gentleman from Alabama (Mr. Bachus), and their staff who put this…





