Those increases are clearly included to support the administration's overly aggressive and unacceptable interior enforcement policies.

A diminished U.S. role at these entities would hurt low-income countries in the world and damage U.S. economic and national security.

These funds may be used for important capital improvements to upgrade much needed security measures.

I vehemently oppose President Trump's travel ban that arbitrarily bars entry of people seeking refuge from certain countries into this country.

I believe we should stay in the JCPOA to ensure aggressive and vigorous enforcement of the deal.

It is a 25 percent cut. And I know that the chairman and I and this committee, as you can see, there is really bipartisan support for these programs.

If enacted, this budget would substantially harm critical U.S. interests, put our embassies and diplomats at risk, and stymie our efforts to counter violent extremism and fight terrorism.

We already know from past implementation that the policy increases the rate of abortions and unwanted pregnancies.

I know we discussed Puerto Rico, so I won't bring that up today. But I hope you really stay on it because the tragedy was overwhelming.

I have heard from emergency responders across my district about the importance of this program in keeping our communities safe.

And that is why I was so pleased to hear Secretary Nielsen state her intention to focus DHS' efforts on hate groups widely, including white supremacy groups.

Your budget proposal prioritizes industry over the health of the American people, in my judgment.