John Katko

I can't think of a more important time for both sides of the aisle to work together on threats facing the homeland.

I truly believe that cybersecurity is the preeminent threat to our National and homeland security and if we don't act swiftly and decisively, we will come to regret it.

Engaging in divisive rhetoric is not the answer and never will be.

Well, it is not often that you hear the private sector saying they need more government mandates, so that, I think, highlights the importance and the magnitude of this problem.

Although it is a positive sign that cases and deaths may be trending down at the moment, the numbers are still way too high.

This is the largest drop since World War II--and it's absolutely tragic.

Pandemic preparedness is a critical part of the Homeland Security mission.

We need to do everything we can to support those suffering, including by taking appropriate steps to get our kids back in the classrooms as quickly and as safely as possible.

The president`s role in the insurrection is undeniable.

The creation of CISA as the Nation's lead civilian cybersecurity agency was necessary and long overdue.

The pre-eminent National and homeland security threat of our time.

We, as a society, as Representative Katko pointed out, are highly digitally dependent.

These cyber threats clearly have real-world consequences, and we must do everything we can to help bring these malicious actors to justice.

It seems, at least in a dot-gov domain, that our efforts for dot-gov security are too confederated and too clunky and ultimately inadequate.

The cybersecurity resilience of our great Nation leaves undeniable room for improvement.

The preeminent National and homeland security threat of our time.

Cybersecurity remains an area of great bipartisan cooperation in Congress, and for that we should be thankful.

I think it is really important and it would be incumbent upon Members of the committee, I think, to join onto the bill and get that bill passed.

Our voices as Members of Congress need to be used to soothe rather than to inflame.

No form--no form--of extremism should ever be tolerated, period.

I think there is support for legislation along those lines on the Republican and the Democratic side.

It would be supremely cool--I don't know how else to say it--if we actually could do it.

There is no question in my mind that the rhetoric inflamed and turned the boiling water from a hot pot of water to overflowing.

The normalization of violence and threats affects their willingness to remain in office, and it could discourage others from entering public service.

It is incumbent upon all of us to be mindful of what that rhetoric can do and what it did in this case.