On May 1, 2015 I was absent for recorded votes No. 208-215. I would like to reflect how I would have voted if I were here: on rollcall No. 208 I would have voted ``no,'' on rollcall No. 209 I would have voted ``no,'' on rollcall No. 210 I would have voted ``no,'' on rollcall No. 211 I would have voted ``no,'' on rollcall No. 212 I would have voted ``no,'' on rollcall No. 213 I would have voted ``no,'' on rollcall No. 214 I would have voted ``yes,'' on rollcall No. 215 I would have voted ``no.'' ____________________
Share & report
More from Joe Crowley
Under rule IX, clause 1, questions of the privileges of the House are ``those affecting the rights of the House collectively, its safety, dignity, and the integrity of its proceedings.'' I would argue there is nothing more of a threat to…
I think I have been toeing that line very closely. The SPEAKER pro tempore. A little bit over it.
I thank the gentleman, my friend and colleague from Kentucky, for yielding. Mr. Chairman, the Republican budget proposal is just cruel. It isn't just cruel; it will set our country backwards. It is worse than cruel. It puts more than $5…
I offer my resolution. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will report the resolution. The Clerk read as follows: Resolution Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the President shall immediately disclose his tax return…





