the electoral system cannot inspire public confidence if no safeguards exist to confirm the identity of voters.

The Voting Section must ensure that those military members who are defending our Republic have the opportunity to participate in it.

DOJ's so-called solution systematically disenfranchises military voters.

The evidence is and all--study after study shows that minorities, young people, low-income people are far less likely to have the kinds of State-issued photo IDs required by these laws.

We are back again with another oversight hearing airing allegations, most of them demonstrably false, against the Department of Justice without inviting the Department of Justice to testify.

I thank the gentleman for yielding, and I rise in opposition to this deeply flawed and deceptively named legislation. Contrary to the bill's title, this bill will not promote access to better health care nor will it make health care more…

Neither Congress nor the executive branch is free to ignore these interests, and far from waging war on the Constitution or/and religion, President Obama and his Administration have sought a sensible balance.

How would you strike that balance?

Sacrificing the rights and needs of women and of the public health by removing the requirement for these critical services or broadly exempting anyone who might object is neither wise nor is it constitutional.

Neither Congress nor the Executive Branch is free to ignore these interests, and--far from waging a war on the Constitution or on religion--President Obama and his Administration have sought a sensible balance that ensures that all women…

the First Amendment, "gives no one the right to insist that in pursuit of their own interests others must conform their conduct to his own religious necessities."

I do think that we have a constitutional problem when a minority in the Senate takes it upon itself to rule against the will of the majority.