Sacrificing the rights and needs of women and of the public health by removing the requirement for these critical services or broadly exempting anyone who might object is neither wise nor is it constitutional.
Nadler argues against removing contraceptive service requirements.
Share
More from Jerry Nadler
A non-binding resolution—or any action that doesn't require the release of the Epstein files—is nothing more than a political smokescreen designed to shield Republicans who refuse to demand full transparency and accountability from the…
If their operations are legitimate and above-board, why is there a need for anonymity, and why don't they need warrants to come onto private property?
But I think a certain amount of change is very helpful, especially when we face the challenge of Trump and his incipient fascism.
Other voices in this conversation
