That is it. There is not much else to say. I do not question the motives of the chairman of the subcommittee, nor the ranking member. They are two of the finest people we have had in this House or ever served in the House. They care about the Indian Nations. But I must tell the gentleman that the language in the bill which attempts to try to help everyone, you are penalizing people who have given their word. I must tell the gentleman, there is a working group now between the Indian Nations and the IHS, and they are discussing what should be done and how it needs to be handled. What we are doing is precluding what they are going to look at and what they are going to decide. They may come up with some ideas that none of us have thought about. We are including that in this language.
James Whittier Parker: “That is it. There is not much else to say. I do not question the motives of the chairman of the subcommittee, nor the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about a bill affecting Indian Nations and the IHS.
Share
More from James Whittier Parker
Let me mention one thing, because we tend in this country over and over again to downcast the IRS. It is an easy thing to do, I guess even in Biblical times the people did not think very highly of the tax collector. But in this country…
I have to tell the gentleman, it will mean a difference of $949,000 a year. That is a massive amount of impact.
Let me just say there is a $65 million shortfall. We have added $26 million. That leaves us $39 million, I mean around $40 million. There is still a shortfall there. So this windfall, supposed windfall is not a windfall, it is still a…
We are also deeply concerned with the language beginning on line 8, page 81 of the bill, which instructs IHS to alter its current contract support cost system to a 'pro rata proportion' system. We ask you to support Representative Mike…





