We are also deeply concerned with the language beginning on line 8, page 81 of the bill, which instructs IHS to alter its current contract support cost system to a 'pro rata proportion' system. We ask you to support Representative Mike Parker's amendment to strike this language from the bill.
Discussing concerns about specific language in a bill related to IHS contract support costs.
Share
More from James Whittier Parker
Let me tell my colleague, the gentleman from Georgia [Mr. Kingston], an interesting thing. The change in the depreciation on the alternative minimum tax, let me tell him what it means. If you have got a business and you reinvest in…
I have to tell the gentleman, it will mean a difference of $949,000 a year. That is a massive amount of impact.
let us put this in perspective. Let us take a tribe that has taken the initiative, and they are paying for their administrative cost, and they have done what we have asked them to do. What I have told the tribes, if the Federal Government…
Let me close by saying, I want to thank my colleagues the gentleman from Missouri [Mr. Talent], the gentleman from Georgia [Mr. Kingston], the gentleman from Michigan [Mr. Hoekstra], and the gentleman from Alabama [Mr. Riley] for…
Other voices in this conversation
