No, that is not the intent of section 6. The sanctions identified in section 6 are intended to be mandatory when selected pursuant to either section 5(a) or 5(b)(1).
Benjamin Gilman: “No, that is not the intent of section 6. The sanctions identified in section 6 are intended to be mandatory when…”
Editor's note · Context
Clarifying the intent of sanctions in legislative discussion.
Share
More from Benjamin Gilman
H.R. 1161, which enjoys bi-partisan support was introduced earlier this session and authorizes the Government of the Czech Republic to establish a memorial in honor of Tomas Garrigue Masaryk, the first President of Czechoslovakia. By…
Bob Hope's lifelong commitment to public service has made him one of the most honored and esteemed performers in our Nation's history. He spent nearly 60 years boosting the morale of our servicemen and women through goodwill tours, USO…
The Afghan Freedom Support Act is an important measure. Afghanistan and the Afghan people are at a critical crossroads today in their survival. Afghanistan has been torn apart by hostilities, by drought, by regional disputes. It has caused…
H.R. 3392 is a fitting tribute to Mr. Solomon. It was due to his efforts on behalf of our veterans that the veterans cemetery at Saratoga was created and that the administration was granted cabinet-level status. As a Marine veteran, it is…





