Political Quotes

On the recordSeptember 18, 2013
Only in Washington would we be having a debate about whether 4 years is okay or 2\1/2\ years is okay when we're talking about a jobs bill. And only in Washington would we talk about cherry-picking when we're talking about the vast majority of the production that is sought for permitting, and the vast number of jobs that is created is not--I want to make this very clear so the record is clear--is not handled within 3 years. Now, it may be true that it's less than the Bush administration, which is fine. Let's assume that it is. But when you're talking about primarily issues that deal with Western lands whose States are at or near a majority of Federal ownership, and you want to talk about the middle class, and you want to talk about generating jobs, and you want to say, hey, by the way, you can take as long as you want; we don't know if you're going to have a job in that industry or not because there are no rules. Only in Washington would we be defending no time limits whatsoever. To say 30 months is a bad idea, with language that says, if both sides agree, you can take longer, is not an unreasonable environmental or administrative stance. Nobody wants a nice, crisp denial in 30 months; and by the way, if the application should be denied, then I presume that it will be denied.…
Said by
Mark Amodei
Republican · Nevada
Source
govinfo.gov
Sep 18, 2013

Share

More from Mark Amodei

Jan 30, 2024

Their combined advocacy for this measure not only highlights the importance critical minerals play in our clean energy future, but also a substantial number of jobs across the United States attributable to responsible mining companies.

congress.gov
Aug 25, 2026

Pocket rescissions would be a very interesting way to curry favor with the legislative branch — especially the one part of the legislative branch which has delivered on all of the administration’s shit.

talkingpointsmemo.com
Mar 6, 2024

I know there is some concern about some of the amounts of wilderness and stuff that is being removed from oil and gas exploration.

congress.gov
Jan 30, 2024

The legislation returns to the workable framework that existed prior to the fundamentally flawed Rosemont ruling.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation