You testified to this subcommittee, last year, that the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (LANSC) was an important tool to help maintain the stockpile.
Jeff Bingaman
The Public Record
Jeff Bingaman is a former U.S. Senator from New Mexico, serving from 1983 to 2013. A member of the Democratic Party, he was known for his work on energy policy, education, and healthcare. During his tenure, Bingaman played a significant role in shaping legislation related to renewable energy and was a strong advocate for the development of clean energy technologies. He served as the Chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, where he focused on issues such as energy efficiency and the promotion of alternative energy sources.
It is critical that these companies continue to have access to the OTC market for these hedges.
We thought that that issue had been resolved with the colloquy on the floor and with report language that we--at least I read to clarify that there was no intent for CFTC to take over regulation of matters that had been jurisdictional at…
This is an important effort, both to create high quality jobs in the near term and also to begin to reverse the course that we've been on of under investing in our country's competitiveness in clean energy technology.
It's also important that we be sure these investments are the right investments.
The energy infrastructure needs of the country are so substantial that I think we can only regard these investments as a downpayment.
I'm not wedded to my proposal, Senator Landrieu, and if there are other people who have better ideas, we ought to figure out a way of moving forward with those ideas.
I am pleased to join with the Ranking Member of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, Lisa Murkowski, in introducing the National Energy Efficiency Enhancement Act of 2010. This legislation would implement several agreements that…
We need to move forward with getting ourselves out of the great dependence that we have on foreign oil.
Hopefully, we can stop robbing LWCF so that we can support more of these projects in the future.
$900 billion, yes, were being credited to the Land and Water Conservation Fund but it never gets there.





