I do not have the time--under six of the aggravating factors. The gentleman from Pennsylvania would have us, under his amendment, basically consider the elements of the offense which, I think, is going to open up the constitutional attack, so the gentleman weakens the bill. Second, Mr. Chairman, as the gentleman from New York [Mr. Schumer] has indicated, the gentleman from Pennsylvania would eliminate life imprisonment without parole. So, Mr. Chairman, we are going to have those situations where a jury does not want to give the discretion to the judge because they want to put him away for a number of years. A jury is going to have to make a decision as to whether to return capital punishment or give the judge that discretion. Mr. Chairman, the gentleman from Pennsylvania [Mr. Gekas] weakens the bill by what he has done, and I would urge a rejection of his amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Debating an amendment related to capital punishment and sentencing during a House floor discussion.
Share
More from William Hughes
I really do not understand a lot of things. I do understand the frustration, because it does seem like an inordinate amount of time has been taken with this investigation, but we have had three U.S. attorneys, one appointed by a…
I rise in strong support of title III of H.R. 6, particularly the Civic Education Program. As my colleagues know, the Civic Education Program called We the People, the Citizen and the Constitution teaches students about the history and…
I support the death penalty, as most of my colleagues know, where I believe it can be constitutionally imposed... a jury can consider, as one of the aggravating factors, the heinous nature of the offense, cruel nature of the offense, or…
I can tell the gentleman there are lots of reasons why I would not want to identify as a prosecutor the subjects or targets of the investigation for a lot of reasons. When you have not completed the investigations, sometimes subjects…





