I do not have the time--under six of the aggravating factors. The gentleman from Pennsylvania would have us, under his amendment, basically consider the elements of the offense which, I think, is going to open up the constitutional attack, so the gentleman weakens the bill. Second, Mr. Chairman, as the gentleman from New York [Mr. Schumer] has indicated, the gentleman from Pennsylvania would eliminate life imprisonment without parole. So, Mr. Chairman, we are going to have those situations where a jury does not want to give the discretion to the judge because they want to put him away for a number of years. A jury is going to have to make a decision as to whether to return capital punishment or give the judge that discretion. Mr. Chairman, the gentleman from Pennsylvania [Mr. Gekas] weakens the bill by what he has done, and I would urge a rejection of his amendment.
William Hughes: “I do not have the time--under six of the aggravating factors. The gentleman from Pennsylvania would have us, under his…”
Editor's note · Context
Debating an amendment related to capital punishment and sentencing during a House floor discussion.
Share
More from William Hughes
When the Supreme Court invalidated all death penalties more than 20 years ago, it did so because of the uncertainty in the law and practice at that time. The Court found that it was not possible to find any rational pattern or set of rules…
Second, the gentleman has misread the bill. A rape, a heinous rape or serious physical abuse, is an aggravating factor under the bill as written.
Mr. Chairman, this issue is about common sense. It is not about eliminating crime because there is nothing we can do to eliminate crime. I own weapons. I am a sportsman, a lifetime member of the sporting community in my district, and I do…
I would say to my dear friend, the gentleman from Florida [Mr. McCollum], and he is a friend, I have worked for many years on crime legislation. When I chaired the Subcommittee on Crime and Criminal Justice of the Committee on the…





