I can tell the gentleman there are lots of reasons why I would not want to identify as a prosecutor the subjects or targets of the investigation for a lot of reasons. When you have not completed the investigations, sometimes subjects automatically become targets as you get more information, and you would not want that disclosed, because you are trying to force others to turn state's evidence, as Mr. Rota has done, after he pleaded guilty. I want to say to my colleague, if you want to talk about partisan politics, if I were interested in protecting a Democrat, do you know what I would do? If I were interested in protecting a Democrat who is a target of an investigation, I would do precisely what you are trying to do, because that would be the way to compromise a criminal investigation and have him walk. I cannot believe you want to do that.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of revealing targets in a criminal investigation during a House debate.
Share
More from William Hughes
I really do not understand a lot of things. I do understand the frustration, because it does seem like an inordinate amount of time has been taken with this investigation, but we have had three U.S. attorneys, one appointed by a…
I rise in opposition to all of the proposed constitutional amendments dealing with a balanced budget. It is important that we do not frame this debate in terms of whether or not a balanced budget is a worthy goal--of course it is. To…
I rise in opposition to the latest version of McCollum, and I think the latest version of McCollum is worse than the first version of McCollum, and I will tell my colleagues why. Mr. Chairman, under the McCollum amendment States would not…
I rise today with great sorrow to pay tribute to a former Member of the House, and a personal friend, the Honorable Thomas C. McGrath, who passed away last week. Tom McGrath represented New Jersey's Second Congressional District in the…





