I think one of the basic principles at stake is we don't license and measure content when it comes to speech, and that is my concern. That, in fact, is because of the multiplicity of communications options that are available to citizens today--as I said before, blogs, Internet, broadband, and satellite--which we didn't have 20, 30 years ago. Where my objection lies, and the importance of this amendment says Government should not be monitoring and regulating content. We are not talking about obscenity. There are things the Senator from Illinois understands the Government has an absolute right to monitor or to deal with. When we get to content--and that is my concern, that those who have raised the issue 'bring back the fairness doctrine,' are bringing it back, and the cry then is to regulate content. And that is what I object to.
Watson Coleman: “I think one of the basic principles at stake is we don't license and measure content when it comes to speech, and that…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about government regulation of speech and content during a debate on communications policy.
Share
More from Watson Coleman
Although I doubt that anyone would disagree with making sure that Federal firearms are secure, this hearing seems to me to be a bit of a red herring.
I stand here today again to condemn another policy that flies in the face of post-9/11 thinking. The State of New York will join eight other States in issuing driver's licenses to illegal immigrants. New Mexico is setting up a program…
I want to rise to take the floor for a few moments to reflect and to pause to think about the life and legacy of former Senator Paul Wellstone and his wife Sheila. It was 5 years ago today that we suffered the terrible tragedy of Senator…
I congratulate the majority and minority leaders, the chairman of the Banking Committee, Senator Dodd, and Senator Shelby. We have done something today the American people should be very proud of. I understand there is an agreement to move…





