My first amendment increases funding for the Department of Transportation's Office of the Inspector General by $1 million and decreases funding for the Office of the Secretary by $1 million. I am very concerned about recent reports that the Department assigned senior officials to smooth a ``special path'' for the Senate majority leader's favored grant projects. I have no problem with funding transportation projects in Kentucky or any other State. We should all have a problem with the Department setting up a concierge service for one State while slow-walking obviously critical projects like New Jersey's Gateway Program. My second amendment makes clear that the Capital Investment Grant program cannot be run in a manner outside the bounds we have established in law. Congress never intended for politically motivated, indefinite delays to transportation projects or for some projects to be held to a much higher standard than others. Infrastructure spending is something we all agree on. It is something we all need. The Acting CHAIR. The time of the gentleman has expired.
Share & report
More from Tom Malinowski
From war in Europe to pandemic around the world to potential crisis in Asia, one of the lessons we are learning is that America should never be dependent on strategic adversaries like China or Russia for the goods most critical to our…
I will vote ``yes'' on the HEROES Act today because it will help the small towns I represent and keep our first responders on the job. I wish that my colleagues would listen to the Republican and Democratic local leaders who are pleading…
This is a rare moment in this House. We have a bipartisan bill, a bill that we have worked together, Republicans and Democrats in the House. We have worked together in the Senate. There is a companion piece of legislation; it has been…
I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. LaTURNER. Mr. Speaker, I yield 4 minutes to gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Crawford).





