As many Members have said when they have come to this microphone in the past, that when you come to the floor, we can all have our own opinion on these matters, but we can't have all our own facts. To use the gentleman from Georgia and also Florida, too, I think said when it comes to the expression of squeezing all the juice out, that's maybe an appropriate expression, but then the question is where did that juice go to and what should it be used for? Well, my suggestion is that the juice should not necessarily always be used for the benefit of the stockholders, but the juice should be basically used for, what was the intent here, to provide for affordable housing for low and moderate income. And as the gentleman from Louisiana just indicated, as we've heard from all the testimony in the committees, the GSEs have not been doing the job that we wanted them to do. And one of the reasons I believe that we now see a bill before us to put on this new housing fund is in part because they have not been doing their job.
Scott Garrett: “As many Members have said when they have come to this microphone in the past, that when you come to the floor, we can…”
On the recordMay 17, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a housing fund and the performance of government-sponsored enterprises.
Share
More from Scott Garrett
Jul 23, 2014
I find it difficult to believe that the SEC will know where to draw the line better than each individual investor.
Jul 11, 2016
For too long our financial regulatory system has been governed by global networks of really detached elites who believe they are smarter than the market and the people when it comes to allocating and assessing risk.
Sep 16, 2014
Designating more private companies as too-big-to-fail and turning their regulation over to the Federal Reserve and its ever-growing safety net, if you will, is not going to solve the problems of taxpayer exposure to the financial system.





