I have stood on this floor several times now speaking about the negative impact that NCLB, No Child Left Behind, has had on our children's education and, consequently, on our children's future as well. Tonight I will speak continuously about that as well and the problems until NCLB are fixed. I will continue to speak out against NCLB until parents and educators are empowered to make the changes that will ensure an environment in which schools can teach and children can learn. More and more information is coming to light attracting more and more supporters to the belief that not only should No Child Left Behind not be reauthorized at this time, but, actually, it should be completely scrapped. Yesterday, in the New York Times, Diane Ravitch, a professor of education at NYU and a former assistant secretary of the U.S. Department of Education, wrote, and I quote, ``the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002 is fundamentally flawed,'' and that it should be ``overhauled, not just tweaked.''
Scott Garrett: “I have stood on this floor several times now speaking about the negative impact that NCLB, No Child Left Behind, has had…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the negative impact of the No Child Left Behind Act on education.
Share
More from Scott Garrett
But why would we want to extend the taxpayer subsidy and bailout safety net to capital markets and asset management?
The Obama Administration officials and their appointed regulatory cheerleaders need to stop putting political politics above the rule of law.
something we can agree on is that the Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to refuse to sell or rent a dwelling to any person because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
I agree with the testimony of Professor Coffee that this committee seems to be rushing from the first Jobs Act to kind of a 'Jobs Act II,' without fully understanding the consequences of the first law.





