In my State of New Jersey, an individual buying family health insurance would pay in the neighborhood of $10,000 a year. But the price that would be offered through the group plan would be considerably less, probably $6,500 to $7,000 a year picked up by the employer. So let us say the employer gives the employee a $6,500 voucher toward the purchase of health insurance. The choice that my constituents would face under this Senate bill that my friend talks about would be to either have the right to hold the HMO accountable and pay $3,500 for that privilege, which the constituent clearly would not have, or not have the right to hold them accountable. Now, that is like saying to someone that we are going to give everyone in America the right to buy a Mercedes Benz for $75,000. Nice right to have in theory, but if a person does not have the money to afford it, they cannot do it.
Rob Andrews: “In my State of New Jersey, an individual buying family health insurance would pay in the neighborhood of $10,000 a year.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of health insurance choices under a Senate bill.
Share
More from Rob Andrews
I thank my friend for yielding. Mr. Speaker, my friend, the chairman from Texas, asked, I think, a couple of very important questions about this amendment, and he really points out why I support it. First, he asked: Where is the proof that…
I thank my friend for yielding. Madam Speaker, the people that we're talking about here tonight in this debate are people who work very hard and have a couple of children, usually, and need some help with their nutrition when they're…
I thank my friend for the time. In March of 2010, the President signed the Affordable Care Act. In that law, there was a revision that said on January 1 of 2014 if insurance plans did not have important consumer protections, like getting…





