I am one of the people who voted for the underlying bill. I think it is excellent in many ways. I agree with the gentleman from Maryland's analysis and the gentleman from Ohio's analysis of the underlying bill. But I am not going to vote for this extension today, and I would adopt the reasoning that the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Stenholm) put forward just a few minutes ago. Right now for every $100 that we are spending to run our government, we are bringing in $80 worth of revenue. We are borrowing the other $20. We are borrowing about half of it from the Social Security trust fund, and we are going to borrow the other half from the private capital markets. I have come to the floor in the last several weeks and voted against a lot of things which I would like to see happen. I would like to see more aid to our exporters, but I voted against the Export-Import Bank reauthorization. I would like to see the marriage penalty permanently done away with, but I voted against the permanent cessation of it. I am one who favors the permanent repeal of the estate tax, but I did not vote for the permanent repeal of the estate tax. And as strongly as I feel about the merits of this underlying bill, and they are very meritorious, I think the principle of doing anything that reduces revenue by borrowing from the Social Security trust fund and from the private capital markets that fuel our economy is a mistake.
Rob Andrews: “I am one of the people who voted for the underlying bill. I think it is excellent in many ways. I agree with the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about government borrowing and fiscal responsibility.
Share
More from Rob Andrews
I think everyone here would like to be sure that those World War II veterans can see that memorial. And the way to do that is to put the Senate bill on the floor and pass it right now, which is what would happen. Before the clock strikes…
I thank the gentleman. So the employer rates, which have risen at the slowest rates in the last 5 or 6 years, would once again be subject to the kind of spikes that happen here. Look, I think there is bipartisan agreement in this Chamber…
I understand this is a conceptual proposal, but we don't legislate concepts; we legislate statutes and they have real impact on real people.
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 9 of rule XX, this 15- minute vote on the motion to table will be followed by a 5-minute vote on passage of the bill, if…





