Taxpayers who object to paying for able-bodied people to stay on welfare should object to this bill, because what it is going to lead to in the long run is more people who are able-bodied being back on public assistance. The flaw in this bill is that it makes mothers choose between pursuing their higher education and taking care of their children. Those mothers will choose, and should choose, to take care of their children. They will work longer hours, but they will not pursue a higher education because the child care that would let them pursue that higher education and take care of their children is not guaranteed in this bill. This bill will breed a new generation of permanent low-income, public assistance recipients. We should move beyond welfare to work, from poverty to independence. Let us reject this bill.
Rob Andrews: “Taxpayers who object to paying for able-bodied people to stay on welfare should object to this bill, because what it is…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a welfare reform bill during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Rob Andrews
I thank the gentleman. So the employer rates, which have risen at the slowest rates in the last 5 or 6 years, would once again be subject to the kind of spikes that happen here. Look, I think there is bipartisan agreement in this Chamber…
I thank my friend for the time. In March of 2010, the President signed the Affordable Care Act. In that law, there was a revision that said on January 1 of 2014 if insurance plans did not have important consumer protections, like getting…
I thank my friend for yielding. Madam Speaker, the people that we're talking about here tonight in this debate are people who work very hard and have a couple of children, usually, and need some help with their nutrition when they're…
I think you are doing some of the most meaningful work in this Congress by your diligence here, and I am proud to be associated with it in a very minor way after the work you have done.





