The issue before the House today is whether or not 2.5 million Americans, whose unemployment benefits have expired or are about to expire, should get extensions. I emphatically believe that they should. Now, the argument that we have heard from the other side--first, about not even taking a vote on this issue and now against extending those benefits--is twofold. The first, which we just heard a version of, is that to extend their unemployment benefits somehow zaps the incentive for people to look for jobs. I would challenge anybody who makes that assertion to go meet 10 or 100 or 500 unemployed people and ask them just how many want ads they have circled, just how many resumes they have sent out, and just how hard they have looked for jobs, and I think that will put that argument to rest. The second argument is a good faith argument that people do not want to add to the national debt.
Rob Andrews: “The issue before the House today is whether or not 2.5 million Americans, whose unemployment benefits have expired or…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is addressing the need to extend unemployment benefits for 2.5 million Americans.
Share
More from Rob Andrews
My understanding of the principle of germaneness is that the underlying subject matter of the bill has to be the subject matter of the motion to recommit. We have heard repeatedly from the offerers of this bill that they believe it is…
And my colleagues, we have listened to the many stories told by people this morning with great empathy about people who got a cancelation notice and want to keep the policy that they have. The issue before the House is whether we want to…
On rollcall No. 1, I was unavoidably detained and had I been present, I would have been recorded as ``present.'' ____________________
I say good morning to our colleagues, and hope that as we focus on the very real pain and burden that so many Americans are feeling that we can act this afternoon to alleviate that pain, whether someone is looking for health care services…





