I would like to join the subcommittee chairman in opposition to this amendment. Members who believe in a balanced and fair competition where the taxpayers get the greatest value for the dollar should oppose this amendment and support the underlying bill. The underlying bill, as the chairman said, is a carefully crafted compromise that permits a rational assessment of the cost and benefits of contracting out, and provides for a fair appeal process where whichever side loses that process would have the opportunity to bring its case to another level and have it reexamined. So I think that the bill is neither pro-contracting out nor anti-contracting-out. I think the bill strikes a fair balance, and it says in instances where someone decides a contract should be permitted, it happens; and for instances where it should not be, it does not. I commend the chairman for crafting a fair compromise. I join him in urging defeat of the amendment.
Rob Andrews: “I would like to join the subcommittee chairman in opposition to this amendment. Members who believe in a balanced and…”
On the recordJuly 25, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to contracting out during a subcommittee discussion.
Share
More from Rob Andrews
Jan 7, 2014
On rollcall No. 1, I was unavoidably detained and had I been present, I would have been recorded as ``present.'' ____________________
Nov 15, 2013
We come here as stewards of a very sacred trust--to look after the people that are the backbone of this country. We are having this debate this afternoon because we have all heard from men and women across this country who are very upset…
Nov 15, 2013
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 9 of rule XX, the Chair will reduce to 5 minutes the minimum time for any electronic vote on the question of passage. This is a…





