I, in fact, support this amendment. I think it not only adds important tools to the bill before the body today but to the law that was enacted last year. Both today's bill and last year's law require the Department of Defense to make early decisions about whether a product or service it is buying or a system that it is buying is on track or not. If it is not on track, the idea is to either get it on track or to not buy it. This is how we can eliminate some of the $296 billion in cost overruns in weapons systems that the Government Accountability Office found in its report of 2 years ago. What Mr. Quigley has done is to say that the cost estimators on whom we are relying need to be truly independent and competent. If that estimator has a vested interest in buying the product or building the system, then he or she is not going to give us an accurate or honest judgment about whether to go forward. So this amendment assures that there will be both independence and competence in those cost estimators. I think it's an excellent addition to the bill.
Rob Andrews: “I, in fact, support this amendment. I think it not only adds important tools to the bill before the body today but to…”
On the recordApril 28, 2010
Editor's note · Context
The speaker supports an amendment aimed at improving cost estimation in defense procurement.
Share
More from Rob Andrews
Nov 15, 2013
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 9 of rule XX, this 15- minute vote on the motion to table will be followed by a 5-minute vote on passage of the bill, if…
Jan 7, 2014
On rollcall No. 1, I was unavoidably detained and had I been present, I would have been recorded as ``present.'' ____________________
Oct 2, 2013
My understanding of the principle of germaneness is that the underlying subject matter of the bill has to be the subject matter of the motion to recommit. We have heard repeatedly from the offerers of this bill that they believe it is…





