I thank my friend for yielding. Nothing in this amendment in any way impairs the relationship between a Christian or Jewish or other soldier or servicemember and his or her faith leader. Nothing. Nothing in this amendment impairs the operation of the Chaplain Corps. What this amendment does is to show respect for the choices made by our servicemembers. My Christianity is an important part of who I am and how I see my life. I don't think that that same right should be denied to a servicemember who does not share my beliefs. What this amendment says is that, for the thousands of servicemembers who choose a humanist or atheistic philosophy system of life, that they should be able to confide in an adviser who is not a mental health professional. Going to a mental health professional is a choice that's laden with risk and some controversy for a member of the service. Going to a faith adviser is not. Depriving those who share the views that Mr. Polis outlined of the chance to go to such an adviser is unequal treatment. It's unworthy of the way we operate. Nothing in this amendment disrupts the Chaplain Corps, but everything in this amendment respects the rights of our servicemembers. I would urge a ``yes'' vote. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman's time has expired. Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, how much time do we have remaining? The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from California has 1\3/4\ minutes remaining. Mr. McKEON. I yield the balance of my time to the gentleman from Kansas (Mr.…
Rob Andrews: “I thank my friend for yielding. Nothing in this amendment in any way impairs the relationship between a Christian or…”
Share
More from Rob Andrews
And my colleagues, we have listened to the many stories told by people this morning with great empathy about people who got a cancelation notice and want to keep the policy that they have. The issue before the House is whether we want to…
I thank my friend for yielding. Mr. Speaker, my friend, the chairman from Texas, asked, I think, a couple of very important questions about this amendment, and he really points out why I support it. First, he asked: Where is the proof that…
I respectfully appeal the ruling of the Chair. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is, Shall the decision of the Chair stand as the judgment of the House?
I think everyone here would like to be sure that those World War II veterans can see that memorial. And the way to do that is to put the Senate bill on the floor and pass it right now, which is what would happen. Before the clock strikes…





