I have thousands of service personnel who serve our country, and I have hundreds of thousands of taxpayers who pay for the government of our country, and I am convinced that the right answer for our service personnel and for our taxpayers is to oppose this amendment. We produced two pieces of legislation that passed the House, essentially unanimously. And in that process of Democrat and Republican working together, we learned something very disturbing, and that was that, in major weapons systems, costs had skyrocketed by $296 billion over what they were supposed to cost, and the delay in fielding these systems had gone from an average of 16 months behind to 22 months behind.
Rob Andrews: “I have thousands of service personnel who serve our country, and I have hundreds of thousands of taxpayers who pay for…”
On the recordFebruary 15, 2011
Editor's note · Context
Speaker Andrews addresses concerns about defense procurement and the impact on service personnel and taxpayers.
Share
More from Rob Andrews
Nov 12, 2013
I understand this is a conceptual proposal, but we don't legislate concepts; we legislate statutes and they have real impact on real people.
Sep 30, 2013
My colleagues, Mr. Speaker, when people in politics don't want to say ``yes'' or ``no,'' they just keep talking. We could do a lot more tonight than just keep talking. We could cast a vote that would say to the American taxpayers, the…
Nov 18, 2013
I think you are doing some of the most important work in our country and you are all doing it very well.
Oct 28, 2013
The best scenario of the four is the status quo, which is grim. The other three compete in terms of their grimness.





