I find it rather ironic that the party of Abraham Lincoln would be pursuing a piece of legislation that has such negative implications for people's individual liberty and autonomy. It is a concern that really has not been brought up yet about this bill, but it is a very practical one, and I want to spend a few minutes talking about it. A few minutes ago, our friends from Pennsylvania and Illinois said that the party who would determine the employee's intent as to primary purpose would be the general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board. In fact, as a practical matter, the first person who would determine the employee's principal purpose would be the employer. The employer is going to determine what the principal or primary purpose of the employee is. How exactly is the employer going to do that? Is the employer going to speak? I assume the employer is going to interview the employee, and most employees are going to say, my purpose is to do the job well.
Rob Andrews: “I find it rather ironic that the party of Abraham Lincoln would be pursuing a piece of legislation that has such…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about a labor relations bill and its implications for individual liberty.
Share
More from Rob Andrews
I demand a recorded vote. A recorded vote was ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This will be a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 261, noes 157, not voting 12, as follows: [Roll No. 587] AYES--261…
I think you are doing some of the most meaningful work in this Congress by your diligence here, and I am proud to be associated with it in a very minor way after the work you have done.
I would like to be heard on the point of order. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from New Jersey is recognized. {time} 1800
I would like to thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith for all their hard work on this bill. In the spring of 2011, a very brave band of Americans executed a mission that brought the country to its feet in ending the reign of…





