the Repaupo Creek watershed in my district in New Jersey is in urgent need of a replacement tide gate and dike restoration project. The project is needed for several reasons, the most important of which is to provide flood protection for the residents of Logan and Greenwich Townships in Gloucester County. The Department of Agriculture's Natural Resource Conservation Service has the authority to undertake projects on watersheds that are smaller than 250,000 acres. This project meets that requirement. Although the Repaupo Creek is a small watershed, the tide gate sits on the Delaware River, and there is some question whether a waiver will be required to do this project. Given the urgent need for this work to be completed, and given that New Jersey officials of the Department of Agriculture have expressed a desire and willingness to work on this project, I ask the chairman on behalf of the subcommittee to agree that there is jurisdiction under present law for USDA to do the work repairing the Repaupo tide gate.
Rob Andrews: “the Repaupo Creek watershed in my district in New Jersey is in urgent need of a replacement tide gate and dike…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the need for flood protection and restoration in the Repaupo Creek watershed in New Jersey.
Share
More from Rob Andrews
I think everyone here would like to be sure that those World War II veterans can see that memorial. And the way to do that is to put the Senate bill on the floor and pass it right now, which is what would happen. Before the clock strikes…
I do, Mr. Speaker. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from New Jersey is recognized to speak to the point of order.
Reclaiming my time, will the chairman agree that the fair thing to do would be to put the Senate bill on the floor so that each Member could cast an up-or-down vote? I yield to the gentleman.
Last night, on rollcall Nos. 32 and 33 for H.R. 1791 and H.R. 357, I am not recorded because I was absent. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on both. Today, on rollcall Nos. 34 and 35 for the Rule on H.R. 3590 and H. Res. 470…





