I would like to thank Chairwoman Ros- Lehtinen and Ranking Member Berman for bringing this resolution forward. I regret but do not doubt its necessity. The issue raised in this resolution is not whether we are authorizing war--because we clearly are not. The issue is not whether the President would have to come to this Chamber--any President--should he conclude that war is necessary--because he clearly would. The issue in this resolution is not whether we should conduct negotiations but how we should conduct negotiations. And this resolution gives us an emphatic opportunity to say that when we are negotiating with a country that has conceived its nuclear weapons program in secret, that has brandished its nuclear weapons program with the rhetoric of hostility, and for whom the attainment of a nuclear weapon would be fraught with peril for free people everywhere, then in the context of that negotiation, our position must be that we will not support or stand for an Iran with nuclear weapons. This is the issue. I would urge a ``yes'' vote. And, again, I thank the chair and the ranking member for their patriotic and unified leadership on this question.
On the recordMay 15, 2012
Source
govinfo.govShare
More from Rob Andrews
Nov 15, 2013
And my colleagues, we have listened to the many stories told by people this morning with great empathy about people who got a cancelation notice and want to keep the policy that they have. The issue before the House is whether we want to…
Oct 1, 2013
I think everyone here would like to be sure that those World War II veterans can see that memorial. And the way to do that is to put the Senate bill on the floor and pass it right now, which is what would happen. Before the clock strikes…
Nov 15, 2013
I respectfully appeal the ruling of the Chair. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is, Shall the decision of the Chair stand as the judgment of the House?





