On the recordMarch 25, 2014
Let me cite the names of some of the folks who signed that letter: Madeleine Albright, former Secretary James Baker, Zbigniew Brzezinski, William Cohen, Stephen Hadley, Henry Kissinger, Tom Ridge, Condoleezza Rice, Clayton Yeutter, Robert Zoellick, Lee Hamilton, Brent Scowcroft, Frank Carlucci, Robert Rubin, Larry Summers, John Snow, and Henry Paulson. This is a bipartisan list of ``Who's Who'' in foreign policy, all saying this is critical to do. Let me be very clear. Opponents have argued that IMF reforms provide no added relief to Ukraine, so it is superfluous to this bill. That argument is patently false. The 2010 IMF reforms strengthen the IMF. That is why they were done. And as it relates to Ukraine, by increasing Ukraine's quota, the reforms increase available short-term lending from $1 billion to $1.6 billion, and longer term resources the IMF can leverage for Ukraine by up to $6 billion. It also strengthens our ability to shape an IMF support package for Ukraine. Critics say IMF reforms undermine U.S. influence and increase Russia's influence in the IMF. They are dead wrong again. We remain the largest IMF shareholder even after reform, we are guaranteed our executive board seat, and we will continue as the only country--the only country--with veto power over major IMF decisions. Meanwhile, the reforms rationalize the voting structure of the IMF to increase buy-in of dynamic emerging economies in a way that ensures continued U.S.…
Source
govinfo.gov




